The long run of Mr. Clegg
Posted on May 20, 2010 by ralph
It can also andargli evil. The vote tonight may disappoint the young man and his friends Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats. But he, Clegg, will remain at the forefront of this exciting adventure in democratic politics concludes the British Isles. The result is not only more unpredictable than it usually is, by its nature, a referendum in the UK, but is likely to be plus a puzzle, as regards the formation of a new government. In this case the outcome would be unusual for a company used as a policy that provides for a two-party tradition, except for a few fleeting exceptions, geometric solutions. Net.
This time promises to be a puzzle, a riddle to decipher and solve. And it was just him, Clegg would create a situation of obvious mold mainland across the channel, so not too popular, but at the same time appealing to a country that likes a little suspense in the stories’ vicious. I mean twisted originals. Moreover, the news has boosted an event that was likely to be granted. So ritual. The desire for change seemed irresistible and would be met.
The good, admirable bear that is Gordon Brown, weighed down by thirteen years of rule, the wrong war (Iraq in particular) promoted, but shared by fellow and rival Tony Blair, and the financial and economic crisis, seemed destined to succumb no way out in front immaculate aristocratic David Cameron, the inventor of a conservative “friend of the people.” But ally in Europe ECRI (party of reformers and conservatives), a small group where there are anti-Semitic extremists in Eastern Europe. One day the photographers who followed while Cameron was discovered in the office by bike behind a car with a driver who wore a sweater parts.
Not everything is rotten in the UK. Woe to say. It would be a blasphemy. And incorrect. London is a marvel. Arriving from Paris has the impression that he left behind a city as beautiful, but slightly faded. Accounts does not add up. The weather this year announced a public debt of 80% of GDP (the Italian one is around 115%), and the budget deficit nearly 11% (twice the Italian one).
Dinner with two bankers in the City listen to a long, dignified lament on the difficulties in global financial capital London. The crisis has hurt. We therefore want a new man, energetic, with plans to relaunch. And this is David Cameron, a young energetic, ready to cut spending and reduce the powers of the state. Gordon Brown has worked well. But in the past.
Many economists are of the same opinion. Wary of the inexperience David Cameron and George Osborne, who will be his finance minister in the event of victory. The Financial Times and the Economist are of the same opinion of the bankers, so I’m with Cameron. Which seemed like the (almost) sure future prime minister.
Nick Clegg has screwed it up. He shattered the political framework in three parts and imposing the two major candidates, the Labour and Conservative, favors a hung parliament, a parliament hung (hanged or), ie without a party with an absolute majority. If this is the result will be for him, Clegg, deciding whom to ally themselves with, and then dictate the conditions for the formation of a coalition government. In a hung parliament, becomes crucial. So polls foreshadow the situation that will be released tonight from the polls.
This role of protagonist Nick Clegg, who although not a total stranger was no real political past behind him, he conquered the three television debates that have assisted a total of twenty-three million British. This reveals what has counted the personality of the candidates, their athleticism, their ability to express themselves. In the theater you would say in acting. Those virtues have counted more programs. I would not say that the TV show has relegated the ideas behind the scenes, because the way the characters were able to express their thought was decisive.
Programs, it is true, were rather similar. Everyone, Brown, Cameron and Clegg have proved what they are: ie, the neoliberals, albeit with different nuances. Everybody wants to bring back the bill. The Labour Party has more heart the role of the state and wants to dilute the essential reduction of public service. The conservative is more assertive, while excluding a possible fee reduction may affect social welfare and public service, and therefore increase poverty and unemployment. The Liberal Democrats denounced the unkept promises and contradictions of the two major parties share power for over fifty years. He has no faults. He has never governed. Accusations of inexperience have not scratched.
Contributes to his charisma, the boldness and elegance of natural language. His passion for literature is evident. His Europeanism not too damaging. The Dutch and Russian ancestry, and Spanish wife, as well as extensive experience in Europe, make it a cosmopolitan character.
Defends the social protection and public service, is sensitive to the plight of immigrants, but shares the conservative liberalism, which, however, criticizes the refusal to raise taxes. It is an example of political correctness.